[MOBY-dev] Re: [MOBY] join operations
Mark Wilkinson
markw at illuminae.com
Thu Jan 23 17:42:14 UTC 2003
On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 11:14, Phillip Lord wrote:
> There is no reason that this should not be implemented by a base
> class. There is no intrinsic reason, for example, why a service
> provider should not forward results onto another service, rather than
> return it directly to the client.
Right - but that is somewhat tangential to my objection... my worry is
putting the onus of interpreting arbitrary complex queries on a service
provider who simply wants to return you a genbank record in response to
a genbank ID. If a service provider *wants* to set up such a complex
service, that is entirely different. I just don't want it to be an
"expectation" of a service provider to perform joins on data which may
or may not reside on his/her machine. As you point out below, this
level of complexity could be handled by a base class. So long as the
service provider can mindlessly return what it was asked for without
having to interpret the higher-level query I would feel comfortable.
Do you see this base class being part of the service, or more like an
'agent'?
> I understand your reservations, but think that they may not be so much
> of a problem as you think.
I tend to be quite reactionary :-) ...eventually I come around...
M
--
=======================================================================
|--==\
Mark Wilkinson \==-| 1001010010010001001010
Bioinformatics Consultant \=/ 0010010010100101110010
Illuminae Media /-\ 0010101110110100100101
727 6th Ave. N. /-==| 0010100100111101010010
Saskatoon, SK, Canada |==-/ 0101001000100101001011
S7K 2S8 \=/ 0100100100010010010101
+1 (306) 373 3841 /\ 1110101101110101001001
markw at illuminae.com /=-\ 1101001010100101010101
|--==\
=======================================================================
More information about the MOBY-dev
mailing list