[GSoC] 7th coding week

[Eric Talevich]

Hi Sarah and Team BioHaskell,

Do you suppose the performance tradeoffs would be any different after the
application is parallelized? (For example, some portion of the workflow
that is more difficult to parallelize begins to dominate CPU usage -- or
perhaps one data structure parallelizes better than another.) If so, would
it make sense to first do the parallelization as you described in your
project plan, and then return to profiling-guided optimizations?

Cheers,
Eric



On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Sarah Berkemer <sarah.berkemer at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> here is my blogpost for this week:
> http://biohaskell.org/GSoC_blog/Weeks_6and7
> Last week I did some debugging and further changes in the current version
> of the code. I also did profiling statistics from both versions, the
> original and the current one with a small input. It can be seen that with
> just a small input, both version need almost the same time. For a large
> input, the original version is still faster. This week I will try to find
> the reason for that.
>
> Have a nice week,
>
> Sarah
>
> _______________________________________________
> GSoC mailing list
> GSoC at mailman.open-bio.org
> http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.open-bio.org/pipermail/gsoc/attachments/20140630/0b3b791c/attachment.html>