[GSoC] Possible project

[Raoul Jean Pierre Bonnal]

i agree and we need a bit of flexibility and maybe guide adopted project in integrating them into obf, that is the nice, valuable and funny challenge ^_^ 
Ra


Pjotr Prins <pjotr2010 at thebird.nl> ha scritto:

>You could make it a Biopython module?
>
>If it were Ruby it would fit. BioRuby, these days, has independent
>modules.
>
>  http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/28/7/1035
>
>Pj.
>
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:50:32AM +0000, Peter Cock wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 7:29 AM, Rob Lanfear <rob.lanfear at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > To clarify, I'm not a NESCent organiser, just a mentor who was hoping to
>> > put a specific project through NESCent. The link is for the project, whose
>> > title is "Automated partitioning for morphological phylogenetics":
>> >
>> > http://informatics.nescent.org/wiki/Phyloinformatics_Summer_of_Code_2014#Automated_partitioning_for_morphological_phylogenetics
>> >
>> > It's a Python (and some external C programs) project, which does not use
>> > any of the Bio* projects. So the questions are really specific to that one
>> > project - I'm interested to know if this is the kind of thing that OBF
>> > might consider as a project.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Rob
>> 
>> Given it doesn't use or extend any of the OBF's Bio* projects,
>> as it stands, I don't see this as a obviously a good fit :(
>> 
>> Perhaps there's a possible slant on this I've overlooked?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>> Peter
>> (OBF secretary, Biopython developer, etc)
>> _______________________________________________
>> GSoC mailing list
>> GSoC at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc
>_______________________________________________
>GSoC mailing list
>GSoC at lists.open-bio.org
>http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc