[GSoC] weekly report #4

P. Troshin to.petr at gmail.com
Tue Jun 12 17:13:11 UTC 2012


Also I cannot help it but the Samba file server is the first thing
that comes to my mind when I hear sambamba.
I suspect it may be just my techy background...
I think that my favorite so far is damtools, because its terribly
close to samtools, which is where you want to be I guess.
However, I can see why its not everybody's favorite and unfortunately
there are already at least a few other damtools around
http://code.google.com/p/dam-tools/,
http://home.earthlink.net/~matthewjheaney/damtools/index.html

P.


On 12 June 2012 17:48, P. Troshin <to.petr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> How about sambamba tools. Less unwieldy.
>
> I think its better, but it's not particularly catchy but please ignore
> me, it is so much easier to critique, when to come up with a really
> good name.
>
> P.
>
>
> On 12 June 2012 08:05, Pjotr Prins <pjotr.public14 at thebird.nl> wrote:
>> sam-bam-baah has the comment of sheep in it. May explain consensus :)
>>
>> How about sambamba tools. Less unwieldy.
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 09:35:59PM +0100, P. Troshin wrote:
>>> None of my business but it's a bit unwieldy. It may be clever, but 99%
>>> people who come across it would not know. mbwana is simpler in that
>>> respect. Sorry for spoiling the consensus :-(
>>>
>>> P.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 June 2012 20:19, Fields, Christopher J <cjfields at illinois.edu> wrote:
>>> > On Jun 11, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Monday, June 11, 2012, Pjotr Prins wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:47:48PM +0400, Artem Tarasov wrote:
>>> >>>> No, thanks...
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I'll call it libsambamba. In suahili, sambamba means 'parallel' (
>>> >>>> http://sn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambamba) Nice coincidence, huh? :)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I like it mbwana.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Pj.
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> As the mentor, you'd be the mbwana or the bwana (boss), not Artem.
>>> >>
>>> >> But I do like lib-sambamba as a name - very clever.
>>> >>
>>> >> Peter
>>> >
>>> > Agreed, fits very well.
>>> >
>>> > chris
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > GSoC mailing list
>>> > GSoC at lists.open-bio.org
>>> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> GSoC mailing list
>>> GSoC at lists.open-bio.org
>>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/gsoc



More information about the GSoC mailing list