[Dynamite] Thoughts

[Ian Holmes]

Cool - but why not just ".idl" instead of ".edl"?
We are still producing legitimate IDL...

-- 
Ian Holmes  ....  Howard Hughes Medical Institute  ....  ihh@fruitfly.org

On Wed, 22 Mar 2000, Ewan Birney wrote:

> 
> So - I am guessing correctly that we
> 
> a) need a common cvs repository (I suggest off bioperl - I can get login's
> all around). We need to set out the basic directory structure here. 
> I propose:
> 
> [the euclid cvs module is the expanded IDL definition]
> 
>     euclid/README
>           /src/idl2stubs.pl 
> 
> [the telegraph cvs module is the dynamite replacement ]
> 
>     telegraph/README
>              /src/SeqModule/SeqModule.edl <--- euclid IDL files called edl's
>                            /seq_impl.c <--- implementation file
> 
> 
> 
> b) we need a formal splitting of the IDL mapping out from the telegraph
> project itself. I propose called it euclid. (NB notice that the last three
> letters are IDL...)
> 
> 
> 
> c) Shall I set these up on bioperl?
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dynamite mailing list  -  Dynamite@bioperl.org
> http://www.bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/dynamite
>