[DAS2] URIs for sequence identifiers
dalke at dalkescientific.com
Tue Mar 14 00:12:52 UTC 2006
>> Problem #2: feature searches return features from either namespace
> A different solution:
> Scaffold and Chromosome coordinate systems are served by separate
> DAS/2 servers. Each server returns data from one and only one
> Those separate servers can, behind-the-scenes, use the same database.
> DAS/2 clients, like IGB, would choose to connect to either the
> Scaffold-based server or the Chromosome-based server, but not usually
> to both at once.
> Does this handle all the issues?
Here's the email I got from Andreas when I proposed this.
>>> There may be more than one COORDINATE element if ... (XXX why?)
> There are several servers that understand more than one coordinate
> system and
> can return the same type of data in different coordinates. (depending
> on which type of accession code/range was used for the request )
> E.g. there are a couple of zebrafish servers that speak both in
> Chromosome and Scaffold coordinates.
> (reason perhaps being that zebrafish is an organism that seems to be
> very difficult to assemble ?)
>> Will there be separate CAPABILITY items for each source?
> no. if there are then this should be registered as two independent
(but see clarification later)
> Allowing multiple coordinate systems per server is a way to slightly
> reduce the already long list of known
> servers. Currently there are about 90 in the registry (+10 in the last
> few weeks...) and there still are about 20 more
> which have not been registered (and are provided by the BioSapiens
>> Long for who? It isn't that much data.
> It is long for somebody who browses manually through the ensembl DAS
> configuration and searches for a DAS source to add to.
> It a "long" list for myself to read through the DAS server list at
> and although I know this list pretty well, it seems to me a lot of
> text/descriptions, etc.
>> There is only one reference server for an annotation server.
> I think it should be one reference server per coordinate system.
>> But if there are two COORDINATES elements, and you say that
>> each has its own reference server, then aren't you saying that
>> a single annotation server may have multiple reference servers?
> yes. i believe that this should be possible.
>> What's the concern about having
>> no more than one coordinate per data source?
> Just last friday somebody asked me how to add a DAS server that has
> two coordinate systems to different Ensembl views ( ContigView and
> Her initial solution was to provide multiple DAS sources
> but I think this could be joint into a single server.
In any case, I think the proposal I outlined in the previous email
makes things cleaner even without support for multiple coordinate
systems on the same server.
dalke at dalkescientific.com
More information about the DAS2