[DAS] Minutes from 2 October 2008 DAS teleconference
Gregg Helt
gregghelt at gmail.com
Thu Oct 30 08:02:34 UTC 2008
Better-late-than-never minutes from 2 October 2008 DAS teleconference:
*Roll Call:*
Gregg Helt (unaffiliated: DAS/2, visualization, data modelling)
Suzi Lewis (LBNL: Apollo, etc.)
Ed Lee (LBNL: Apollo, annotation data models)
Ann Loraine (UNC: plant genomics, genomics vizualization)
Jon Nicols (UNC: genomics visualization )
Steven Blanchard (UNC: sys admin, security)
Andy Jenkinson (EBI: coordinator for DAS services at EBI)
Jonathon Warren (Sanger: coordinator for DAS services at Sanger)
Felix Kozinski (Sanger: DAS coordinator for Sanger ENCODE project)
*DAS/2 Status Summary:*
Gregg gave overview, refer to "DAS/2 Grant Final Progress Report" post
(October 2nd, 2008) on DAS/2 mailing list:
http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/das2/2008-October/000438.html
Stuff in summary not covered in progress report:
Alan Day is no longer at UCLA, and not working on the biopackages DAS/2
server (chado, BioPerl based DAS/2 server)
Possibility of deploying biopackages DAS/2 server on a MOD chado
installation (BOP? VectorBase?)
Several people at annotation workshop are using Apollo for curation
alongside IGB for viewing dense quantitative data.
*Hinxton DAS1 Summary*
Registry:
now have DAS1 registry
was one of the major things missing from DAS1 that motivated DAS2
most clients use the registry
about 400 sources in the registry
implements validation
uses same sources command as DAS/2
extensions
alignments
structures
interactions
in general evolving into a much wider system for biodata
core client/server implementations maintained at Sanger and EBI
lots of other implementations using DAS1, so heavy investment in DAS1
writeback
one preliminary implementattion (partly based on DAS/2 writeback spec),
but nothing solid yet
grant application being submitted December 8th
collab between Sanger, EBI, and NBN (South Africa)
includes writeback component (client and server implementations)
client will be in DASTY
translation/bridge between protein and genomic space
another goal of Sanger/EBI/NBN grant in preparation
Revising DAS1 spec (DAS 1.6)
refer to biodas wiki pages:
http://www.biodas.org/wiki/Spec_Review
http://www.biodas.org/wiki/DAS_Plans
no changes yet to sources, folded in as is from extensions, deprecate
dsn
"DAS is the general weapon of choice for integrating data throughout Sanger,
and largely at EBI as well"
*Other spec revision:*
DAS/2 spec frozen in November 2006, Gregg feels its time for revision
regardless of other integration, should make sure sources spec evolves in
sync between DAS1/2
Gregg's revisions: Two Plans
#1. DAS 2.1 --> relatively minor revisions to spec
#2 no name yet --> much larger change
possibly integrating DAS1 and DAS2
move on top of Atom/AtomPub/GoogleData stack
*Andy -- DAS1 and DAS2*
#2 above seems to be a good direction to go in from a technical
standpoint
but, DAS/2 as it stands also seems to be good from a technical
standpoint
major sticking point is backward compatibility with DAS1
doesn't see how can convince powers that be to commit to DAS/2 without
backward compat
other alternative is if there's a proxy that is very successful at DAS1
--> DAS/2 conversion
Gregg -- still working on proxy, has expanded scope
about a week away from usable
proxy: DAS1.53 - dsn + sources
source code going up on google code project hosting
*DAS2 Funding*
Ann: recently awarded grant includes funding for DAS/2 arabidopsis
server
wants to expand to cover many plants
hopefully deployed at TAIR
Suzi -- TAIR is using Apollo
visualization
UI improvements to IGB
surveying different genomics visualization tools
want to have easy way for small data providers to host data
support/development of GenoViz toolkit
Gregg:
Lincoln committed to putting someone on DAS/2 client/server
support for GBrowse
Gregg, Suzi, Ian Holmes discussing putting in distributed
annotation grant
submit to NIH Feb 2009
combine ideas and code from Apollo, JBrowse, IGB, DAS/2
GMOD help desk now at UNC -- may be interested in joining in
Andy -- prospects for grant focused on DAS itself as opposed to DAS
within other projects?
Gregg -- problematic. already had DAS/2 grant from NIH
Suzi -- NIH now wants biology driving projects -- plain infrastructure
things don't tend to fly
Gregg -- maybe could get funding again, but first need more results from
initial DAS/2 grant
tried big reup three years ago, didn't fly
need to get a paper out, more sites using
Andy -- what would help is involvement of major institution
Gregg -- but we tried with UCSC and PDB in reup, may have helped but
still didn't get funding
involvement of major data repository necessary but not
sufficient for funding
Andy -- in Europe industry partnership very important when asking for
funding now
possibility of funding to build network of integrated EBI
resources based on DAS,
that industry could use,
possibility of money from UK/Europe, but probably need to use
what funding already have
Ann -- what about developing a web services RCN (Research Coordination
Network) via NSF
example: Microarray Coordination Network
includes outreach
in plant community people are using BioMoby a lot, but it's
complicated to use?
Ann will look into NSF RCN funding possiblities
iPlant (NSF)
Sanger and EBI funding for DAS comes mostly from core informatics funds
Andy -- discuss joining DAS1 and DAS2 in NSF proposal?
would want institutes on both sides of the pond
Suzi -- UCSC over here?
Gregg -- I think they'd be amenable
*Action Items:
*schedule for DAS/2 teleconferences: every other Thursday @ 9AM PST
what are we talking about at the next one?
get specific about specification changes
start listing specific aims for grant proposals
More information about the DAS
mailing list