[BioSQL-l] Re: [Bioperl-l] RE: SeqWithQuality and biosql

[mark.schreiber at novartis.com]

Good point. I would prefer a system that only uses delimiters for 
ambiguous cases like the one you show but I guess thats pretty complex so 
maybe delimiters for every sub-alphabet.

- Mark





Hilmar Lapp <hlapp at gnf.org>
07/07/2005 12:30 AM

 
        To:     Mark Schreiber/GP/Novartis at PH
        cc:     "Richard HOLLAND" <hollandr at gis.a-star.edu.sg>, Bioperl 
<bioperl-l at bioperl.org>, biosql-l at open-bio.org
        Subject:        Re: [Bioperl-l] RE: SeqWithQuality and biosql



On Jul 5, 2005, at 10:37 PM, mark.schreiber at novartis.com wrote:

> Actually under my proposal
>
> (a(17)) would imply (DNAx(SubInteger[0..9]xSubInteger[0..9]))
>

That's why I didn't like it - how would you encode 
(DNAx(SubInteger[0..99]xSubInteger[0..99]) in this proposal? Require 
each component to be two-digit? There ought to be delimiters between 
the operands, no?

                 -hilmar
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------