[BioSQL-l] GO dbxrefs in swissprot
Hilmar Lapp
hlapp at gnf.org
Thu Jul 1 12:05:13 EDT 2004
On Thursday, July 1, 2004, at 06:29 AM, Andreas Henschel wrote:
> Strange enough, its not that all GO dbxrefs get ignored: the
> bioseqdb.dbxref table contains more then 9000 GO entries. The
> swissprot flatfile contains more than 52000, though (tested with > grep).
How many unique entries are these though? Keep in mind that the dbxref
table is normalized.
When you say the GO dbxrefs did not appear, how do you mean? Are you
referring to dbxrefs present in the source file but absent as
association rows in bioentry_dbxref?
If you have a swissprot entry that has GO dbxrefs in the source file
but fails to have those associated in bioentry_dbxref, check whether
the Bio::Seq object that's coming from the parser has them as
annotation. It would sound strange if some entries get the associations
whereas others don't.
-hilmar
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121 phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the BioSQL-l
mailing list