From p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com Wed Jan 21 09:29:28 2026 From: p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com (Peter Cock) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2026 14:29:28 +0000 Subject: [Biopython] Planning Biopython 1.87 Message-ID: Dear Biopythoneers, I think once the following are resolved (they have pull requests), we should do the next release: * NumPy 2.4 compatibility https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/5135 * Using pyproject.toml rather than setup.py https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/5142 Ideally sooner rather than later as the PDB _ATOM_FORMAT_STRING glitch introduced in Biopython 1.86 seems to be hitting a lot of people: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/5097 Is there anything else you think is urgent enough to wait on? Thanks, Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com Fri Jan 23 05:11:32 2026 From: p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com (Peter Cock) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 10:11:32 +0000 Subject: [Biopython] Planning Biopython 1.87 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Also https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/5109 which Michiel has been working on. Peter On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 2:29?PM Peter Cock wrote: > Dear Biopythoneers, > > I think once the following are resolved (they have pull requests), we > should do the next release: > > * NumPy 2.4 compatibility > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/5135 > > * Using pyproject.toml rather than setup.py > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/5142 > > Ideally sooner rather than later as the PDB _ATOM_FORMAT_STRING glitch > introduced in Biopython 1.86 seems to be hitting a lot of people: > https://github.com/biopython/biopython/issues/5097 > > Is there anything else you think is urgent enough to wait on? > > Thanks, > > Peter > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: