[Biopython] Is this a valid genbank record?
Peter Cock
p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com
Wed Jan 18 14:50:05 UTC 2012
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Michael Thon <mike.thon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2012, at 12:03 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Michael Thon <mike.thon at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> They have weird feature locations:
>>>
>>> Het join(bond(127),bond(127),bond(130),bond(130),bond(138),
>>> bond(138),bond(139),bond(138))
>>>
Do you actually need to do anything with this feature? If not, then
the pragmatic solution is we issue a warning but otherwise ignore
the feature and continue parsing. I'm struggling to grok exactly
what this location is trying to convey - maybe I should read the
associated paper?
>>
>> Are you happy to test an updated parser?
>>
>
> I'm happy to volunteer my student to test it :) Just post here when its ready
> and we'll try it.
Will do, with more details about how to test it.
Peter
More information about the Biopython
mailing list