[Biopython] Numbering MODEL sections in PDBIO?

[Eric Talevich]

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Konstantin Okonechnikov <
k.okonechnikov at gmail.com> wrote:

> What about the proposed patch to bug 2950?
> There could be another solution - get rid of explicit model id variable,
> and
> use the id as the key in model map, but perhaps this would lead to
> compatibility problems.
>


Hi Konstantin,

Sorry I've neglected your patch -- it's been a busy month and I'm traveling
right now. But I do plan to test out your patch and propose it for inclusion
in Biopython as soon as possible.

Does anyone else have an interest in testing this patch? In particular, can
you think of any way that adding a keyword argument to the Model constructor
would break existing code?

Thanks,
Eric



> > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Peter <biopython at maubp.freeserve.co.uk
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:38 AM, João Rodrigues <anaryin at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > >
> > > > I am using Bio.PDB to parse some PDB files and some have multiple
> MODEL
> > > > records. I only want to keep the first one so I created a Select
> class
> > > that
> > > > accepts models for model.get_id() == 0. It works :)
> > > >
> > >
> > > This sounds like Bug 2950,
> > > http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2950
> > >
> > > See also:
> > > http://bugzilla.open-bio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2951
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Biopython mailing list  -  Biopython at lists.open-bio.org
> > > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Biopython mailing list  -  Biopython at lists.open-bio.org
> > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>         Konstantin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biopython mailing list  -  Biopython at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython
>