[Biopython-dev] Should we recommend "pip install biopython"?

Peter Cock p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com
Sun Oct 25 10:28:58 UTC 2015


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Tiago Rodrigues Antao <tra at popgen.net> wrote:
>>
>> A few notes:
>>
>> 1. pip is a default with 3, but optional with 2
>
> Also optional on Python 3.3, but included with Python 3.4
> onwards.

Chris Mitchell pointed out pip is also included with Python 2.7.9
onwards: https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-279/

See: https://github.com/biopython/biopython/pull/645

He's also suggesting conda under Windows.


Peter


More information about the Biopython-dev mailing list