[Bioperl-l] Build failure on upgrade using CPAN
Fields, Christopher J
cjfields at illinois.edu
Sat May 6 23:34:31 UTC 2017
This shouldn’t affect other BioPerl code that I know of.
BioPerl-Run modules are always a bit more difficult to test, primarily b/c they wrap executables but don’t have an easy way to evaluate support versions of software within tests (Samtools for instance I’m sure isn’t updated for the 1.x releases). Do you have the below tools (BLAT, Bumby, etc) installed?
chris
On 5/6/17, 4:30 PM, "Bioperl-l on behalf of Warren Gallin" <bioperl-l-bounces+cjfields=illinois.edu at mailman.open-bio.org on behalf of wgallin at ualberta.ca> wrote:
Hi,
I’ve been trying to upgrade to the latest BioPerl but I am getting test failures that prevent the installation of BioPerl-Run.
Here is the summary of test failures:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/Blat.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 40 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 40
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 39 tests but ran 40.
t/Gumby.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 8 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 124 tests but ran 8.
t/MCS.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 4 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 1-2
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 24 tests but ran 4.
t/Match.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 7 tests but ran 1.
t/PhastCons.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 6 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 181 tests but ran 6.
t/SABlastPlus.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 69 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 73 tests but ran 69.
t/Samtools.t (Wstat: 7424 Tests: 37 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 29
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 41 tests but ran 37.
Files=83, Tests=2309, 16 wallclock secs ( 0.39 usr 0.19 sys + 12.86 cusr 2.58 csys = 16.02 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 7/83 test programs. 6/2309 subtests failed.
CJFIELDS/BioPerl-Run-1.007001.tar.gz
./Build test -- NOT OK
//hint// to see the cpan-testers results for installing this module, try:
reports CJFIELDS/BioPerl-Run-1.007001.tar.gz
Failed during this command:
CJFIELDS/BioPerl-Run-1.007001.tar.gz : make_test NO
So my question is, is the failure to build BioPerl-Run going to affect my ability to use the installed Distributions and Modules listed here:
Bundle Bundle::BioPerl (CJFIELDS/Bundle-BioPerl-2.1.9.tar.gz)
Distribution BOZO/Fry-Lib-BioPerl-0.15.tar.gz
Distribution CDRAUG/Dist-Zilla-PluginBundle-BioPerl-0.25.tar.gz
Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.007001.tar.gz
Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.6.924.tar.gz
Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-DB-1.006900.tar.gz
Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-Network-1.006902.tar.gz
Distribution CJFIELDS/BioPerl-Run-1.007001.tar.gz
Distribution CJFIELDS/Bundle-BioPerl-2.1.9.tar.gz
Module < Bio::Gonzales::Role::BioPerl::Constructor (JWB/Bio-Gonzales-0.062.tar.gz)
Module < Bio::LiveSeq::IO::BioPerl (CJFIELDS/BioPerl-1.007001.tar.gz)
Module < Dist::Zilla::PluginBundle::BioPerl (CDRAUG/Dist-Zilla-PluginBundle-BioPerl-0.25.tar.gz)
Module < Fry::Lib::BioPerl (BOZO/Fry-Lib-BioPerl-0.15.tar.gz)
Module < Pod::Weaver::PluginBundle::BioPerl (CDRAUG/Dist-Zilla-PluginBundle-BioPerl-0.25.tar.gz)
Author BIOPERLML ("Bioperl-l" <bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>)
15 items found
Sorry for what may be a question with an obvious answer, but these results seem too complex for me to interpret.
Warren Gallin
_______________________________________________
Bioperl-l mailing list
Bioperl-l at mailman.open-bio.org
http://mailman.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list