[Bioperl-l] Bio::Seq issue

[Hilmar Lapp]

Hi Paolo,

Do you have some experience with using git and github? If you fork the repository, make your change, and then send us a pull request, your fix tracks under your username, rather than only a mention in text in a commit message if we applied a patch.

See here for documentation:
http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Using_Git#Forking_and_Pull_Requests

	-hilmar
 
On Jun 7, 2012, at 8:20 AM, Paolo Pavan wrote:

> Ah! Ok, I see. You use the primarySeq method instead, I agree, my fault.
> Actually I meant to write that but I didn't and perl of course does never
> complain! ;-)
> And forgive me for the duplicate post, I wasn't sure it was delivered.
> 
> Bye,
> Paolo
> 
> 2012/6/7 Peter Cock <p.j.a.cock at googlemail.com>
> 
>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paolo Pavan <paolo.pavan at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> No, I didn't already send the patch because the mailer daemon blocked it.
>>> 
>> 
>> No, it just was just delayed for moderation. It made it to the list:
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2012-May/036593.html
>> 
>> In general any attachment seems to trigger this.
>> 
>> Peter
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
===========================================================