[Bioperl-l] Bio::Seq issue
Leon Timmermans
l.m.timmermans at students.uu.nl
Thu Jun 7 10:04:17 UTC 2012
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Paolo Pavan <paolo.pavan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do someone agree that they should have the same behaviour?
> It the case, attached patch file applied to Bio/Seq.pm file should do the
> job.
I agree, but your patch is flawed. Peeking and poking into the
internals of another object is a bad idea from a maintenance point of
view, it should probably look like
sub is_circular { shift->primary_seq->is_circular(@_) }
Leon
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list