[Bioperl-l] move ancient branches to attic

Chris Fields cjfields at illinois.edu
Fri May 14 00:41:57 UTC 2010


It would be nice to at least designate them as outdated in some respect, and organize them along those lines.

chris

On May 13, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:

> Why? What is the gain from deleting branches that you don't know whether they are dead or not?
> 
> 	-hilmar
> 
> On May 13, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Robert Buels wrote:
> 
>> To clean up branches, I propose to deleting branches (merged or not) whose head is older than Jan 1, 2006, and moving branches to attic/ whose head is older than Jan 1, 2009.
>> 
>> Note that there are still tags for all the old releases, so those won't be lost.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> Rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> -- 
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
> ===========================================================
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l





More information about the Bioperl-l mailing list