[Bioperl-l] move ancient branches to attic
Chris Fields
cjfields at illinois.edu
Fri May 14 00:41:57 UTC 2010
It would be nice to at least designate them as outdated in some respect, and organize them along those lines.
chris
On May 13, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> Why? What is the gain from deleting branches that you don't know whether they are dead or not?
>
> -hilmar
>
> On May 13, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Robert Buels wrote:
>
>> To clean up branches, I propose to deleting branches (merged or not) whose head is older than Jan 1, 2006, and moving branches to attic/ whose head is older than Jan 1, 2009.
>>
>> Note that there are still tags for all the old releases, so those won't be lost.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Rob
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
> --
> ===========================================================
> : Hilmar Lapp -:- Durham, NC -:- hlapp at drycafe dot net :
> ===========================================================
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list