[Bioperl-l] [Fwd: Enquiry about Remoteblast.pm]

[Dave Messina]

> Is there a misunderstanding here?


Whoops, yes there is — that's my fault, too. I did not read carefully and conflated EUtilities and RemoteBLAST.


Just to be clear, the upcoming email requirement will be for EUtilities, NOT for RemoteBLAST.




Thanks for clearing that up, Peter.
Dave




On Mar 5, 2010, at 14:31, Peter wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Robert Bradbury wrote:
>> 
>> (For example, no open/public discussion regarding the email
>> requirement for remote blasts...).
>> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> What email requirement for remote blasts are you talking about?
> 
> Note that the email referred to earlier talks about to unrelated
> issues, (1) changes to the BLAST output with the introduction
> of BLAST+, and (2) the upcoming email requirement for Entrez
> (aka  E-utilities, they have been very clear about that with
> plenty of warning).
> 
> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/open-bio-l/2010-February/000615.html
> http://lists.open-bio.org/pipermail/bioperl-l/2010-February/032159.html
> 
> 
> Peter