[Bioperl-l] Size of BioPerl distribution
Robert Buels
rmb32 at cornell.edu
Thu Sep 17 22:04:47 UTC 2009
Chris Fields wrote:
> Any ideas? Should we try to have a common biodata repo again?
Beyond encouraging people to keep the test data smaller (I would think
that multiple MB in a test data file is quite excessive!), I don't think
it's worth worrying about that much. The stuff in bioperl needs a
significant amount of test data, and I think that's fine.
This problem is also addressed by the ongoing effort to break things up
into more distros, I think that will help a lot.
Rob
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list