[Bioperl-l] Size of BioPerl distribution
    Robert Buels 
    rmb32 at cornell.edu
       
    Thu Sep 17 22:04:47 UTC 2009
    
    
  
Chris Fields wrote:
 > Any ideas?  Should we try to have a common biodata repo again?
Beyond encouraging people to keep the test data smaller (I would think 
that multiple MB in a test data file is quite excessive!), I don't think 
it's worth worrying about that much.  The stuff in bioperl needs a 
significant amount of test data, and I think that's fine.
This problem is also addressed by the ongoing effort to break things up 
into more distros, I think that will help a lot.
Rob
    
    
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list