[Bioperl-l] Bio::AnnotatableI function annotation()
    Hilmar Lapp 
    hlapp at gmx.net
       
    Sat Mar 28 19:24:29 UTC 2009
    
    
  
On Mar 27, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Chris Fields wrote:
> Not sure if we really need to add AnnotatableI to SeqFeatureI; I  
> think that would be up to the SeqFeatureI implementation, and it  
> doesn't hurt leaving it out.
I still think we should leave it out. It should be left to  
implementors to decide whether they need both or not, and the  
SeqFeatureI contract shouldn't dictate it.
Or quoting from another of your emails:
> 1) whether you want to mix your 'peanut butter' with your  
> 'chocolate' or keep them separate (amazingly, some people don't like  
> Reese's peanut butter cups),
I like them, but they are so heavy that I can't eat a lot of them.  
There should be a possibility to have SeqFeatureI's that have  
chocolate but not peanut butter so you can have more of them.
	-hilmar
-- 
===========================================================
: Hilmar Lapp  -:-  Durham, NC  -:-  hlapp at gmx dot net :
===========================================================
    
    
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list