[Bioperl-l] Re: Bio::Moose is now....
sidd.basu at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 20:12:26 UTC 2009
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Chris Fields wrote:
> Biome! This makes the most sense to me; as Mark points out the name works
> as an appropriate acronym (BioPerl with Metaclass Extensions), as well as a
> biome being (per wikipedia):
> "a climatically and geographically defined areas of ecologically similar
> climatic conditions such as communities of plants, animals, and soil
> organisms ... often referred to as ecosystems".
> Seems a fitting name for a open-source project. I'll be moving the
> namespace over to Biome over the next couple of days on github. Now I owe
> Mark some beer...
+1 for that name, have to update by repository now.
So, how the namespace would be now, everything Bio::Moose => Biome.
And Bio::Moose::Role becomes Biome::Role, Bio::Moose::Location becomes
> Now, for extensions, should I assume this will eventually be BioPerl2 (and
> thus use BioX::*)? Or stick with BiomeX::*?
I would stay with BiomeX
> PS: Just a quick benchmark for the current Bio::Moose::PrimarySeq
> implementation (we don't have SeqIO working as of yet, so the benchmark
> script does the heavy lifting):
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the Bioperl-l