[Bioperl-l] bioperl reorganization
Mark A. Jensen
maj at fortinbras.us
Sat Jul 18 16:10:23 UTC 2009
After carefully reading this thread, weighing the pro and cons of the different
positions, and searching out both the scientific and personal content of the
reponses, I am compelled as a new core developer to say emphatically:
"So long, and thanks for all the fish."
No. I actually thought that a little analysis might tell us what BioPerl thinks
its core is. So I invite you to check out
and come back swinging.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Buels" <rmb32 at cornell.edu>
To: "Mark Jensen" <maj.fortinbras at gmail.com>; "BioPerl List"
<bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] Tree refactor? was Re: Bootstrap, root, reroot...
> Rather than putting this in bioperl-dev, perhaps this would be a nice
> opportunity to make a new distribution called something standard like
> "Bio-Tree", with a standard directory structure, and a sane number of modules
> in it.
More information about the Bioperl-l