[Bioperl-l] Priorities for a bioperl-1.6 release

[aaron.j.mackey at gsk.com]

> Or is the split intended to be 'core' == "anything and everything that 
> was in 1.4", '????' == "everything else"? In which case, what's a good 
> name for "modules created after 1.4"? 'crust'? ;)

Nah, "icing".

a module "use" map might be very useful to help identify "core" vs. other 
layers of mantle/crust/icing.

  http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=87329
  http://search.cpan.org/src/NEILB/pmusage-1.2/

Some more serious alternatives to "bioperl-dev" and "-tools" might be: 
"-accessory" or "-optional" or "-other" or "-addons", etc.

-Aaron