[Bioperl-l] Take 2 of the new subversion repository.

[Jason Stajich]

I'll try and look into this and other stuff with the migration in  
next week or so - maybe we'll make some time to talk it through  
during BOSC.  I don't know yet when I'll actually have time to think  
about it properly.

I am still worried about doing https because of the current system we  
have supporting user logins and that we didn't want to run a web  
server on the main repository machine and we'll have to install DAV  
on the main repository machine.  if ssh+svn is going to be sufficient  
hurdle for people, note it was already a hurdle for them with CVS,  
but we'll have to think a bit more on it.

We might be able to do some sort of NFS (or other exported FS) but  
exported to the webserver machine but that is may be a recipe for  
disaster.

-jason
On Jul 10, 2007, at 4:11 PM, George Hartzell wrote:

> Chris Fields writes:
>> [...]
>> We prob. need to schedule a specific day/time when the switchover
>> would take place so we can announce (so everyone knows and no one can
>> gripe).  Did we ever resolve the svn->cvs issue?  Jason pointed out
>> some tools a while ago...
>
> I haven't done anything about it.
>
> I think that we also need to have some input from the admin/support
> folk about access methods (https, etc...).
>
> Are we going to want to mirror the repository anywhere?
>
> g.
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l

--
Jason Stajich
jason at bioperl.org
http://jason.open-bio.org/