[Bioperl-l] DB.t failures

[Chris Fields]

On Feb 15, 2007, at 7:37 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:

> Jay Hannah wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Sendu Bala wrote:
>>> DB.t is failing with BIOPERLDEBUG set. Apparently, we are no longer
>>> getting sequences back from NCBI in the order we requested them in
>>> batch
>>> mode.
>>
>> Is this the same result you get?
>>
>>
>> DIED. FAILED tests 59-60, 63-64, 67-68, 71-72
>>          Failed 8/113 tests, 92.92% okay (less 8 skipped tests: 97
>> okay, 85.84%)
>> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ---
>> -------
>> DB.t           8  2048   113    8   7.08%  59-60 63-64 67-68 71-72
>> 8 subtests skipped.
>
> Yes, those fails are all caused by results in the wrong order (I  
> believe).

I'm fixing those now so it doesn't depend on order and will commit in  
the next few minutes.

chris