[Bioperl-l] Bio::Graphics::Panel gridlines and pixels
Mitch Skinner
mitch_skinner at berkeley.edu
Wed Feb 7 23:26:53 UTC 2007
Lincoln Stein wrote:
> Zero is not a forbidden coordinate, since gbrowse also works on
> genetic maps which have negative and floating point coordinates.
> You've simply picked up a boundary case where the rounding isn't
> working properly. I will fix this now.
Thanks for the fix. What do you think of the following case?. This is
something I actually ran into. Suppose you have:
the original draw_grid:
my $first_tick = $minor * int($self->start/$minor);
and my version of map_pt:
my $val = $flip
? ($pr - ($length - ($_- 1)) * $scale)
: (($_-$offset-1) * $scale);
$val = int($val + .5 * ($val <=> 0));
and scale=0.5, offset=0, pad_left=0, flip=0, and minor=10.
Our tiles are currently 1000px wide. So the first gridline will be at
0bp => -1px and the 200th gridline will be at 2000bp => 1000px. So the
first tile will not have a gridline at it's 0th pixel but the second
tile will have one there. Last night I was thinking that this was an
artifact of having gridlines start at 0bp but now I'm thinking this is
just because rounding half-pixels leaves an extra space when crossing
zero. Which is not unreasonable; it just invalidates the assumption I
was hoping to make that the gridlines are the same for each tile. Maybe
it's just unreasonable to think that floating point calculations will
give pixel-exact results.
Or I may just be barking up the wrong tree entirely. Perhaps it's time
to reconsider at a higher level (see my next message).
Mitch
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list