[Bioperl-l] For CVS developers-potentialpitfall with "return undef"
David Messina
dmessina at wustl.edu
Thu Jun 8 00:50:48 UTC 2006
Thanks for letting me know, Chris.
Here's a new round of results on bioperl-live checked out moments ago:
[OS X 10.4.6, perl 5.8.6]
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
t/DBCUTG.t 29 5 17.24% 26 30-32
t/LocusLink.t 23 1 4.35% 23
t/PopGen.t 89 1 1.12% 85
t/psm.t 255 65280 48 35 72.92% 29 32-48
t/tutorial.t 21 15 71.43% 7-21
121 subtests skipped.
Failed 5/232 test scripts, 97.84% okay. 34/11099 subtests failed,
99.69% okay.
Fixed since earlier today
=========================
Annotation.t
PhysicalMap.t
TaxonTree.t
alignUtilities.t
New since earlier today
=======================
PopGen.t
t/PopGen.....................FAILED test 85
Failed 1/89 tests, 98.88% okay (less 2 skipped tests: 86
okay, 96.63%)
Unchanged
=========
DBCUTG.t
LocusLink.t
psm.t
tutorial.t
Remote-server tests were run like before. I forgot to mention last
time that I skipped the local DB tests and I don't have bioperl-ext
installed, so several staden-related tests were also skipped.
Dave
My results from earlier today for reference:
> Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> -------
> t/Annotation.t 89 2 2.25% 79 88
> t/DBCUTG.t 29 5 17.24% 26 30-32
> t/LocusLink.t 23 1 4.35% 23
> t/PhysicalMap.t 14 2 14.29% 11-12
> t/TaxonTree.t 17 30 176.47% 11 18-42
> t/alignUtilities.t 9 1 11.11% 9
> t/psm.t 255 65280 48 35 72.92% 29 32-48
> t/tutorial.t 21 15 71.43% 7-21
> 114 subtests skipped.
> Failed 8/232 test scripts, 96.55% okay. 18/11057 subtests failed,
> 99.84% okay.
More information about the Bioperl-l
mailing list