[Bioperl-l] bioperl 1.5.1 RC1 up

[Brian Osborne]

Jason,

OS X 10.4 (perl 5.8.6), all accessory modules installed:

All tests successful, 123 subtests skipped.
Files=220, Tests=9916, 404 wallclock secs (164.46 cusr + 30.23 csys = 194.69
CPU)

Brian O.


On 9/21/05 11:44 PM, "Jason Stajich" <jason.stajich at duke.edu> wrote:

> Release candidates for Bioperl 1.5.1 is up -I've not tagged anything
> in CVS so commits should continue to be made to the repository HEAD:
> 
> http://bioperl.org/DIST/bioperl-1.5.1-rc1.tar.gz
> http://bioperl.org/DIST/bioperl-1.5.1-rc1.zip
> 
> Tests pass for me on OSX with some, but not all dependancies installed.
> 
> I do see this for t/OntologyStore.t and a failed test --
> MSG: [5/5] tried to fetch http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/
> *checkout*/song/ontology/so.definition?rev=HEAD, but server threw
> 500.  re
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> t/OntologyStore.t                6    4  66.67%  3-6
> 125 subtests skipped.
> Failed 1/220 test scripts, 99.55% okay. 4/9916 subtests failed,
> 99.96% okay.
> 
> I believe aspects of this test should be disabled without
> BIOPERLDEBUG=1.
> 
> I think the Changes file and README will need to be checked over and
> corrected for this release.
> 
> Can folks check over for any test failures.  I believe RestrictionIO
> is going to fail on perl 5.6.x but I don't know exactly what the
> workaround is - other than detect perl version and skip tests where
> appropriate.
> 
> Can anyone speak up for bioperl-run and bioperl-ext as to whether or
> not we can tag and put these out as developer release as well?  I
> need someone to help out with testing these packages and getting them
> ship-shape for a release too.
> 
> -jason
> --
> Jason Stajich
> Duke University
> http://www.duke.edu/~jes12
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> http://portal.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l