[Bioperl-l] releasing next week

[Brian Osborne]

Barry,

my $tmpdir = "t/tmp";
mkdir($tmpdir,0777);

So this fails for you? What about:

mkdir $tmpdir

?

Brian O.


On 9/9/05 12:16 AM, "Barry Moore" <bmoore at genetics.utah.edu> wrote:

> Jason,
> 
> BioDBGFF.t failed cause I gave it the wrong Postgres login detail -
> can't remember my damn password!
> RemoteBlast.t passed when run individually.
> RestrictionIO.t failed to open an output file because the directory
> didn't exist, and it wasn't clear to me why it should.
> Didn't look into tutorial.t failures.
> 
> System is Debian Woody, Perl 5.6.1, and fresh live bioperl.
> 
> Failed Test       Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------
> t/BioDBGFF.t                   138  138 100.00%  1-138
> t/RemoteBlast.t      2   512     6    1  16.67%  2
> t/RestrictionIO.t               14    1   7.14%  10
> t/tutorial.t       255 65280    21    6  28.57%  19-21
> 122 subtests skipped.
> Failed 4/215 test scripts, 98.14% okay. 143/9892 subtests failed, 98.55%
> okay.
> 
> Barry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bioperl-l-bounces at portal.open-bio.org
> [mailto:bioperl-l-bounces at portal.open-bio.org] On Behalf Of Jason
> Stajich
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 3:30 PM
> To: bioperl-l List
> Cc: Scott Cain
> Subject: [Bioperl-l] releasing next week
> 
> All tests pass for me on two different machines.
> 
> If you have any reason for the 1.5.1 release to not happen next week,
> please speak up now.  I'm trying to time it with the GMOD Gbrowse
> release so people can feel comfortable upgrading to bioperl 1.5 and
> the latest Gbrowse at the same time.
> 
> The only test failing for me to DBCUTG.t this seems  to be a
> webserver error - perhaps they have changed their interface?  This is
> rather minor so I won't let it hold up the release if no one looks at
> it before next week.
> 
> I'm choosing to ignore the "" overloading in SeqFeature/Annotation
> objects for 1.5.1.  Similarly, adding additional seqfeature tests are
> going to be on the backburner for this release but need to be done
> before the 1.6 release.
> 
> I'd like to see if we can help Brian with the SeqIO test overhaul.
> This seems like the only other outstanding issue.
> 
> My feeling is the TypedSeqFeature implementation can wait, perhaps in
> a future 1.5.x in prep for 1.6.
> 
> I'm thinking I will try and put a release candidate up by Monday and
> release as soon as a few people have tested it out.  Please do me a
> favor and do a fresh CVS checkout and run make test on your own
> machines to see what else still needs work.
> 
> 
> -jason
> --
> Jason Stajich
> Duke University
> http://www.duke.edu/~jes12
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> http://portal.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> http://portal.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l