[Bioperl-l] bioperl development

[Allen Day]

i really like having projects on sourceforge for all the reasons mentioned 
in this thread.  i'd try to use a sourceforge or gforge site, if it was 
available.

-allen


On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Paulo Almeida wrote:

> You might want to consider gforge (http://gforge.org), which was created
> as a branch of the Sourceforge code, when that ceased to be Open Source.
> That could bring SourceForge's features to the existing infrastructure,
> giving you the best of both worlds. I never used it, but I wouldn't mind
> finding out how it works, if you would be interested.
> 
> -Paulo
> 
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:56:11PM -0500, Jason Stajich wrote:
> > 
> > If we could get content-management and RSS feeds to be easy to update 
> > and edit that might make sense.  If we moved a majority of the web site 
> > over to something like moveable-type.  This is what in fact the 
> > biopython.org site is now done with and how the news.open-bio.org site 
> > is run.
> > 
> > These are good thoughts - as always it take some energy and time to put 
> > into place a new system.  We really welcome anyone trying to make this 
> > a better system.  At some level it is hard for the core developers to 
> > be project managers, developers, and system administrators.  So any 
> > help is really much appreciated.
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at portal.open-bio.org
> http://portal.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>