[Bioperl-l] "richer" tree nodes
Ewan Birney
birney@ebi.ac.uk
Mon, 15 Jul 2002 16:02:06 -0400 (EDT)
In this sort of case, I reckon 3 is both the simplest and the sanest - if
you wanted to attach truely something funky (an ancestral sequence object,
pubmed abstracts, kitchen sink, whatever) I would have suggested the
factory solution but reasonably-common statistics or (even) a pretty
generic tag-value system is "ok" in my book.
This is in the keep-it-simple-until-it-starts-to-look-ugly design mode
(KISUISTLU principle... now that is catchy! you heard it here first
folks...)