[Bioperl-l] Added test for multiple fasta parsing

[Hilmar Lapp]

Elia Stupka wrote:
> 
> > for both the 06-branch and the main trunk. So if I take the output of that
> > script as the indicator for the presence or absence of a bug in
> > multiple-entry fasta reading, as you suggested, then there was no bug.
> 
> The reason for which the test passes is that I have commented out those
> lines from fasta.pm both from the main trunk and branch. I wouldn't have
> written a test and left it failing on purpose (and I am sorry for SeqIO),
> jut to prove my point to somebody...

As I mentioned in my email, I did *not* update BioPerl except for this
single test script. My last update of fasta.pm is from Oct 11th. So, the
fasta.pm I was using is without any of the recent changes, with the
allegedly offending code still fully in effect.

Let me know if I misunderstood you.

	Hilmar
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp@gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------