[BioLib-dev] installation on cygwin
Mark A. Jensen
maj at fortinbras.us
Tue May 5 12:17:29 UTC 2009
The latest configured and made fine; I also get the segfaults. Will
investigate--cheers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pjotr Prins" <pjotr.public14 at thebird.nl>
To: "Mark A. Jensen" <maj at fortinbras.us>
Cc: "BioLib Project" <biolib-dev at lists.open-bio.org>
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 8:18 AM
Subject: Re: [BioLib-dev] installation on cygwin
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 02:11:49PM -0400, Mark A. Jensen wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>> Am trying to build on cygwin (I know, I know...). Have got cmake. I do
>
> I am adding automated testing for BioLib. Here the current results
> for Cygwin. You can see Ruby and Python are fine. Perl segfaults
> after loading the DLL's.
>
> Pj.
>
> BioLib
> 0.0.4rc1
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 1.5.25(0.156/4/2) 2008-06-12 19:34
> cmake version 2.6-patch 2
>
> SWIG Version 1.3.36
>
> Compiled with g++ [i686-pc-cygwin]
>
> commit 2b86377a107be1443ef579cb54943658e0b91cdc
> Author: pjotrp <pjotr.public01 at thebird.nl>
> Date: Mon May 4 13:42:40 2009 +0200
>
> Fix Perl test to find DLL
> biolib git at github.com:pjotrp/biolib.git
>
> This is perl, v5.10.0 built for cygwin-thread-multi-64int
> (with 6 registered patches, see perl -V for more detail)
>
> Running tests...
> Start processing tests
> Test project /home/xxx/autotest/biolib
> 1/ 2 Testing TestPerlExample ***Exception: SegFault
> 2/ 2 Testing TestPerlStadenIOLib ***Exception: SegFault
>
> 0% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 2
> 1 - TestPerlExample (SEGFAULT)
> 2 - TestPerlStadenIOLib (SEGFAULT)
> ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [i386-cygwin]
> Running tests...
> Start processing tests
> Test project /home/xxx/autotest/biolib
> 1/ 2 Testing TestRubyExample Passed
> 2/ 2 Testing TestRubyStadenIOLib Passed
>
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 2
> Running tests...
> Start processing tests
> Test project /home/xxx/autotest/biolib
> 1/ 2 Testing TestPythonExample Passed
> 2/ 2 Testing TestPythonStadenIOLib Passed
>
> 100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 2
>
>
More information about the BioLib-dev
mailing list