[Biojava-l] biojava/biojavax

[Mark Schreiber]

Hi -

On the whole biojavax supports more formats and has a more detailed
object model. The parsers are generally more reliable but sometimes a
little strict about modifications to a format.

We are currently trying to do some stress testing of format reading.
In the most current CVS release I have added more informative
exception statements that make it easier to debug parsing issues.

- Mark

On 3/26/07, Sofia Burvall <Sofia.Burvall at hgen.slu.se> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently updating some code that require biojava. I am
> interested in having as many sequence formats as possible supported
> and I want it to be stable. I was wondering if there are any
> differences between biojava and biojavax in those aspects?
>
> Thank you
> /Sofia
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>