[Biojava-l] SAX, DOM, XPath and Flat files
Andy Yates
ayates at ebi.ac.uk
Tue Dec 4 10:42:19 UTC 2007
David Huen wrote:
> On Dec 4 2007, Andy Yates wrote:
>
>
>> be wanting. It more depends on is there a good enough XPath
>> implementation that can handle the XML files we'll be pushing through
>> it (why is it I think the answer is no).
>>
> And why is it I think you are right? :-)
Lol :)
>
> Some of the XML files used by bioinformaticians can be horrendously
> large and at least some of the XML packages do appear to behave like
> they bring the whole file into a memory representation before allowing
> you to work on it. I think memory use and performance was a major factor
> in the current BJ implementations adopting an event-based model even
> though it's more difficult to use usually.
>
It is one of my biggest concerns that a huge DOM model + BioJava model
is going to take up a lot of memory. However if a SAX, StAX (either one)
or DOM based parser is hidden behind a good enough interface hopefully
the implementation used can be up to the user. That said these goals
maybe too different & distant for us to be able to do it.
Andy
More information about the Biojava-l
mailing list