[Biojava-l] yes, something like this

[Magic Fang]

Michael Heuer wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Matthew Pocock wrote:
>
>  
>
>>The OWL for biojava looks ok though. Hey ho.
>>    
>>
>
>Is this a tease? :)  What would/could one do with an OWL representation of
>the biojava object model?
>
>   michael
>
>
>
>  
>
Does the OWL means the Open Wrokflow/Lifecycle model?  I would refer it 
to owl, that few would see it or I am confused on biojava architecture:-)
It is more complex than bioperl.