[Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?

[Schreiber, Mark]

How about we roll out a biojava1.3pre2 which has a combined code base
and if it blows chunks we can migrate back again?

- Mark


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael L. Heuer [mailto:heuermh at acm.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2003 9:58 a.m.
> To: Schreiber, Mark
> Cc: smh1008 at cus.cam.ac.uk; biojava-l at biojava.org; 
> biojava-dev at biojava.org
> Subject: RE: [Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we 
> migrate to 1.4 as our base JVM?
> 
> 
> 
> I think it's probably fine to move to one source tree, but 
> it's also harmless to leave it as is, as the build file 
> checks for 1.4.
> 
> So I guess, if you want to do it, I'd say go fer it.
> 
>    michael
> 
> 
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Schreiber, Mark wrote:
> 
> > Hi -
> >
> > I'd support a unification of the whole codebase to Java1.4.
> >
> > Does anyone on the security council want to veto that (oops 
> that may 
> > have been in bad taste).
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: David Huen [mailto:smh1008 at cus.cam.ac.uk]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, 19 March 2003 4:58 a.m.
> > > To: biojava-l at biojava.org; biojava-dev at biojava.org
> > > Subject: [Biojava-l] JVM level for BioJava - should we migrate to 
> > > 1.4 as our base JVM?
> > >
> > >
> > > It appears that all the platforms I am aware of (MS, 
> Linux, Irix, OS 
> > > X,
> > > Tru64) have now got 1.4 releases.
> > >
> > > Our existing codebase is split across Java-1.3 and 1.4 with some 
> > > features compiled only on 1.4.
> > >
> > > Would it be feasible to reunify our codebase? More 
> specifically, is 
> > > there any reason that we are aware of why we should NOT 
> put the 1.4
> > > as the base
> > > JVM for BioJava 1.3 and later?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > David Huen
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at biojava.org 
> > > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
> > >
> > 
> ======================================================================
> > =
> > Attention: The information contained in this message and/or 
> attachments
> > from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
> > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
> and/or privileged
> > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or 
> other use of, or
> > taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by 
> persons or
> > entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited 
> by AgResearch
> > Limited. If you have received this message in error, please 
> notify the
> > sender immediately.
> > 
> ==============================================================
> =========
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at biojava.org 
> > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
> >
> 
> 
=======================================================================
Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments
from AgResearch Limited is intended only for the persons or entities
to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited by AgResearch
Limited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately.
=======================================================================