[Biojava-l] Nightly checkin reports (Re: [Biojava-dev] biojava /Security)

[Matthew Pocock]

Seems like I'm already using these reports to see if
reported bugs have been fixed yet. Thanks Thomas -
it's realy usefull.

Other than seconding Mark's request for user IDs by
commits, could I ask if the JUnit reports could be
left off if all tests pass, or perhaps just listing
those that fail? Also, I've seen ANT returning a
successfull build status even when JUnit tests fail -
have you double-checked the status reports in the
nightly reports for correctly flaging test failures? 

Thanks again,

Matthew

 --- Thomas Down <thomas at derkholm.net
> wrote: 
> Once upon a time, Schreiber, Mark wrote:
> > These are great!
> >  
> > As a wish list suggestion (only if it is possible
> and it can be done 
> > in a reasonable amount of time). Could the name of
> the person 
> > commiting be added to the file. This will be
> useful for me when 
> > backporting to biojava1.3 branch so I can ask the
> original commiter 
> > if I'm not clear on how appropriate a change is to
> 1.3 and what 
> > dependencies are needed etc.
> 
> That's definitely on the to-do list.  It didn't make
> it into
> the first cut because it's not entirely trivial to
> do with
> pure CVS commands.  Current plan is to exec
> something like
> cvs2cl to do most of the work.  This will happen,
> but maybe not
> for a week or two,
> 
>      Thomas.
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  Biojava-l at biojava.org
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l 

________________________________________________________________________
Want to chat instantly with your online friends?  Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/