[Biojava-dev] maven artifacts
LAW Andrew
andy.law at roslin.ed.ac.uk
Tue Oct 12 15:12:34 UTC 2010
Folks,
Picking up from a thread at the tail end of September about current status, it was mentioned that all successful builds get dumped to a biojava maven repository. That's fine and dandy, but is there any chance that the procedure could tag the artifacts with something more permanent than the current 3.0-SNAPSHOT moniker?
I ask because we have some code that we would like to punt out to the general public as an early alpha/beta release of the Jensembl API. However, I can't put it onto maven central unless it can be made to rely on something concrete and permanent. If, every time I go back to the biojava repository, what has the same name as the artifact that I built against is now something completely different then I'm stuffed.
There was mention in September of proposals for publishing (or perhaps I misread that bit). What is the current status and are there plans to punt out a frozen reference version that we can code against whilst the nuts and bolts continue to get refined in the subversion/git/<<insert favourite scm here>> repositories?
Later,
Andy
--------
Yada, yada, yada...
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336
Disclaimer: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed. If you have received it in error, please destroy all copies and inform the sender.
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
More information about the biojava-dev
mailing list