[Biojava-dev] Contributing chromatogram support to BioJava
Matthew Pocock
matthew_pocock at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 10 15:27:45 EST 2003
Hi Rhett,
I totaly see your point. Perhaps the simples should be made more
visible. Darn, I guess we should have had a .symbols.spi package :) This
sort of issue hits up hard against one of the limitations of java-like o
o programming languages - it's hard to come up with a single right way
to represent things, but it's also hard to dynamically map different
interfaces and stoorage paradigms between one another without writing
loads of adaptors.
The other way to do this named properties milarkie is to treat each
property as an entry in an alignment. So, you could publish some
well-known labels (say on a *Tools class, or an extention of the
Alignment interface) called things like DNA, OFFSET etc., and then when
you parse the scf file, spit out one of these alignments with all the
bits labeled up. Then the access API would look something like:
Alignment scf = // get an scf object from some source
Symbol dna = scf.getSymbolAt(ScfTools.DNA, 7);
Symbol offset = scf.getSymbolAt(ScfTools.OFFSET, 10);
and if someone wanted just one of the quality values (which I don't know
the names of, but let's call it Q4)...
SymbolList q4Vals = scf.symbolListForLabel(ScfTools.Q4);
This isn't perfect, but it may be better on the applications memory
footprint (when looking at loads of traces) and will play nicer with the
.gui.sequence package. Any way, see what you think. You're in charge of
the package :)
Matthew
--
BioJava Consulting LTD - Support and training for BioJava
http://www.biojava.co.uk
More information about the biojava-dev
mailing list