[Biojava-dev] ModelInState fixed?

[Russell Smithies]

Hi,

Did the HMM ModelInState stuff ever get fixed?
(the bit Matthew broke:-)

Russell

> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 10:57:05 +1200
> From: "Schreiber, Mark" <mark.schreiber at agresearch.co.nz>
> Subject: RE: [Biojava-dev] bytecode
> To: "Matthew Pocock" <matthew_pocock at yahoo.co.uk>,
> <biojava-dev at biojava.org>
> Message-ID:
> <AF026AF0FF4B054590228FD1F1DE5165011BA438 at inbox.agresearch.co.nz>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi -
>
> Can I put in a request for semi hidden markov models or states with a
"time spent in state" distribution if your not too busy :)
>
> - Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Pocock [mailto:matthew_pocock at yahoo.co.uk]
> Sent: Mon 14/04/2003 9:25 a.m.
> To: biojava-dev at biojava.org
> Cc:
> Subject: [Biojava-dev] bytecode
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been poking arround in the bytecode package.
> CodeGenerator now has two methods - stackDepth() and
> stackDelta() that let us calcualte a stack depth for
> methods (or macros). This lets us chose a sane stack
> depth for methods when making the class files -
> hopefully removing David's errors.
>
> BioJava compiles against this new bytecode.jar, but
> could  people take this for a spin before we commit it
> to biojava-live - I don't want to break all our
> feature projection stuff by accident.
>
> If I get bored this comming week, I'll add in full
> support for generics / templates to the package. This
> should let us define algorithms like "sort" for any
> type and then emit the bytecode for the algorithm over
> a concrete type like "int". Should come in usefull in
> like a million little places - like in DP kernels, or
> SSAHA inner-loops, or turning math data-structures
> into code.
>
> Matthew
>