[MOBY-dev] Urgent re-request

Mark Wilkinson markw at illuminae.com
Mon Jul 9 23:11:20 UTC 2007


>> if nothing happens, why don't you just post the missing authors here,
>> and we share the affiliation finding work?


Okay, that's a good idea.  I'll compile what I have and then put the rest  
of them out to the community for help.

I'm still struggling with writing a response to this review.  There are a  
few valid points where we clearly missed talking about some issue or  
another, but most of it is... very very odd!  I find myself writing and  
re-writing paragraphs trying to understand what the question is, and  
eventually find myself simply copy/pasting quotes out of the manuscript  
itself!  Case in point - the reviewer asks for a concrete example of  
BioMoby passing a legacy data-type, in a comment where they refer to the  
paragraph about the object ontology.  Well... in that EXACT paragraph  
there is not only a concrete example in the text of that paragraph (EMBL),  
but there is also a reference to a figure where the concrete XML for an  
EMBL object is written-out longhand!

I am not usually defensive when I get reviews, but this one has me  
completely baffled!  I simply don't understand what the reviewer is  
asking/expecting us to change...   I don't suppose it is sufficient to say  
"in response to your comments and questions, please read the manuscript  
again"  ;-) ;-)  I am, however, tempted to ask PLoS ONE to try harder to  
get a second reviewer, since I don't think this reviewer represents our  
intended target-audience... (and being reviewed by one person isn't really  
a robust review, in my opinion)

Anyway, I'm going to try to have a polite and attentive response finished  
by Wednesday to send out to you all for comment.

Cheers!

M





On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 04:20:36 -0700, Pieter Neerincx  
<Pieter.Neerincx at wur.nl> wrote:

>
> On 9-Jul-2007, at 11:42 AM, Björn Usadel wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>
> Good plan. In large parts of Europe the summer holiday periods have
> started so some of the authors missing might be unplugged for a while...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Pi
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Björn
>>
>> mark wilkinson wrote:
>>> So far I have only 5 responses from the ~40 "authors" on the paper.
>>>
>>> I need your affiliation information ASAP please!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Mark
>>> --
>>> Mark Wilkinson
>>> ...on the road!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MOBY-dev mailing list
>>> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
>>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MOBY-dev mailing list
>> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
>> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Wageningen University and Research centre (WUR)
> Laboratory of Bioinformatics
> Transitorium (building 312) room 1034
>
> Dreijenlaan 3
> 6703 HA Wageningen
> The Netherlands
>
> phone:  0317-483 060
> fax: 0317-483 584
> mobile: 06-143 66 783
> mail: pieter.neerincx at wur.nl
> skype: pieter.online
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MOBY-dev mailing list
> MOBY-dev at lists.open-bio.org
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/moby-dev



-- 
--
Mark Wilkinson
Assistant Professor, Dept. Medical Genetics
University of British Columbia
PI Bioinformatics
iCAPTURE Centre, St. Paul's Hospital
Tel:  604 682 2344 x62129
Fax:  604 806 9274

***CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE***
This electronic message is intended only for the use of the addressee and  
may contain information that is privileged and confidential.  Any  
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication by  
unauthorized individuals is strictly prohibited. If you have received this  
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply  
e-mail and delete the original and all copies from your system.
 



More information about the MOBY-dev mailing list