[EMBOSS] EMBOSS 4.1.0 released

[Ryan Golhar]

Maintaining the version number from the original code is important.  I guess
this is the nice thing about RPMs - it adds a release number after the
version number for changes to the RPM which is what I've been using.  

What about adding a field to the version number to signify EMBOSS version
relationships?  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Rice [mailto:pmr at ebi.ac.uk] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 9:44 AM
> To: golharam at umdnj.edu
> Cc: 'Fernan Aguero'; emboss at emboss.open-bio.org
> Subject: Re: [EMBOSS] EMBOSS 4.1.0 released
> 
> 
> Ryan Golhar wrote:
> > I agree.  I was also expecting the version number on the 
> tarballs to 
> > change as well.  At the moment, there is no way to tell they were 
> > updated...
> 
> The embassy changes are all minor. We like to use the version 
> numbers of the 
> original code so it is a little difficult to merge in the 
> EMBOSS version ... 
> without making up a very long version number.
> 
> Does anyone have strong preferences?
> 
> Peter
>