[BioSQL-l] Re: HSQLDB support...

[Hilmar Lapp]

A year later, but I finally managed to add them to the repository.

Would you test them as I don't have an HSQLDB running? Also, would you 
be willing to maintain them? I'm trying to catch up with the changes 
driven by Biojava at the end of last year (which led to issues this 
year again), and so I have already added the term_relationship_term 
table and foreign key constraints.

(I'm also adding this to the other RDBMS's versions and will commit 
when I tested them.)

	-hilmar

On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 07:58  PM, Len Trigg wrote:

> Hilmar Lapp wrote:
> > Sounds reasonable to me. Also, would be consistent with the other 2
> > supported platforms.
>
> This reminds me, I ported the BioSQL schema to support HSQLDB, and
> added the neccessary support to BioJava's BioSQL binding. We use
> HSQLDB in our BioSQL unit tests, and I have seen references to other
> people making use of it. I have attached the appropriate schema files,
> if you wish include them as part of the BioSQL project (in which case
> BioSQL CVS can become the canonical location).
>
>
> Cheers,
> Len.
>
> <biosqldb-hsqldb.sql><drop-biosqldb-hsqldb.sql>
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------