[Bioperl-l] bioperl vs other bio*
cjfields at illinois.edu
Mon Apr 11 13:50:58 UTC 2011
IIRC there was a push to add SFF parsing via io_lib binding at one point, but that seems to have fallen apart. Wouldn't be terribly hard to do, we have some XS code that could be cleaned up to support this (or we can use BioLib bindings, which did work to some degree).
On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Miguel Pignatelli wrote:
> Hi Albert,
> I don't know if there is a comprehensive list of "missing" features in bioperl, but I have come across one of these some months ago. It seems that bioperl lacks IO support for SFF format files while, at least, biopython has (Bio.Seq.SffIO). I started to write a module for this, but I haven't found too much time to finish it...
> On 11/04/11 10:53, Albert Vilella wrote:
>> This may have been asked before but, what is the current set of
>> features in bioperl compared
>> to biopython, biojava and other bio* projects?
>> Has anyone listed the features present in bioperl not present in the
>> other bio* projects?
>> And what I specially would like to know, what are the missing features
>> in bioperl that other
>> bio* projects have been quicker at implementing?
>> Bioperl-l mailing list
>> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l at lists.open-bio.org
More information about the Bioperl-l