[Bioperl-l] releases {1.0.2, 1.1}

[Jason Stajich]

I tested it on a bunch of OSes and perl versions, seems to happen on perl
< 5.6.1, I put a check for this and skip the test if running perl < 5.6.1
-- easiest workaround for now.

-jason


On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, Steve Chervitz wrote:

> Was this ever resolved? Is it platform-specific? I don't see this error on
> intel Red Hat 7.2 with the latest 1.0.2 tarball.
>
> Steve
>
> --- Hilmar Lapp <lapp@gnf.org> wrote:
> > Now only Exception.t fails.
> >
> > Failed Test   Stat Wstat Total Fail  Failed  List of Failed
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > t/Exception.t  255 65280     8    1  12.50%  8
> > Failed 1/96 test scripts, 98.96% okay. 1/3576 subtests failed, 99.97%
> > okay.
> >
> > Cool Jason. The Exception.t failure needs to be fixed though, the 'bizarre
> > copy of CODE' looks bizarre ...
> >
> > 	-hilmar
> > --
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp@gnf.org
> > GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioperl-l mailing list
> > Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> > http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>
>
>
> =====
> Steve Chervitz
> sac@bioperl.org
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
> http://autos.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Bioperl-l mailing list
> Bioperl-l@bioperl.org
> http://bioperl.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l
>

-- 
Jason Stajich
Duke University
jason at cgt.mc.duke.edu