[Bioperl-l] All tests pass

Ewan Birney birney@ebi.ac.uk
Mon, 16 Dec 2002 10:01:59 +0000 (GMT)

On Sun, 15 Dec 2002, Jason Stajich wrote:

> These are all the same warnings on gets on UN*X systems which is nice to
> see nothing different rearing its head in win32.
> What exactly do you get for the subroutine redefined messages as I don't
> see this at all on UN*X.

This is active state being overly paranoid about redefinition of 
subroutines ... which is bad...

> The XEMBL server is in fact down apparently or these tests are really
> hosed.  Perhaps Martin can get a chance to check this out before the
> release.
> The SearchIO warnings are something that we've discussed before which need
> Steve or myself to go in and retrofit his modules (the previous plan had
> been to nuke them for the release but that won't happen now).
> Alternatively we drop the one test which is cauing this (writing
> HTMLBlast for Steve's objects) but people will get these types of
> messages when attempting to dump out HTMLBlast reports using objects
> created with the Bio::SearchIO:psiblast parser anyways so I guess it
> ought to be fixed even though we're going to stop supporting this parser
> soon.

I hate to say it - but I think they should be fixed. Jas/Steve - can one 
of you take this on?