[Bioperl-l] Pushing towards 1.2

[Hilmar Lapp]

So it seems we kind of know what the risks are from not merging. 
What are the risks from doing the merge (for release only or for 
good) though? Too-many-args errors during build time I remember, but 
I believe that has been solved? If not, it's a show-stopper, unless 
we prominently document work-arounds. The build time would be 
prolonged quite significantly (since it like doubles the # of 
modules, right?), which will mostly annoy the developers only. For 
this reason I'm actually not particularly excited about merging them 
back into the bioperl-live repository.

	-hilmar

On Sunday, December 1, 2002, at 08:04 AM, Ewan Birney wrote:

>   (c) Trial a merge of bioperl-live and bioperl-run ---- I think a 
> merge
> is sane (note - should we just say "screw this, lets put the 
> bioperl-run
> stuff back into bioperl-live" or something funkier). This is my 
> headache.
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Hilmar Lapp                            email: lapp at gnf.org
GNF, San Diego, Ca. 92121              phone: +1-858-812-1757
-------------------------------------------------------------